Rumoured to have cost £150 grand & signed 3 year dealWhat a pity we couldnt have brought Scott Quigley in....15 goals last season in a poor Barrow side....instead he moves to Stoclport County in the NL. Another missed opportunity.
£100 grand and large wages out of our rangeI am not sure Quigley is really good enough for us to be honest. Paddy Madden I would certainly want, but not Quigley.
Next week apparentlyBeen in holiday for a week so posted less on here. It doesn’t seem we’re making much headway on the experienced striker front. We’ve got the makings of a good squad elsewhere, but the clock is definitely ticking.
Quigley is a useful player but I don't think he is worth that. Stockport appear to have money to burn (for now).£100 grand and large wages out of our range
Property developer has been putting in a lot of money since last seasonQuigley is a useful player but I don't think he is worth that. Stockport appear to have money to burn (for now).
No it's not today its 31st July v Burnley u23sAnyone heard anything about the Burnley behind closed doors friendly being played today?
Aaah I was sure there was a game today...No it's not today its 31st July v Burnley u23s
Think there may have been an inter squad game today, if so would have been 6 a sideAaah I was sure there was a game today...
Thanks
I think from Mellon's comments it might have been a full eleven v eleven game including the youth players.Think there may have been an inter squad game today, if so would have been 6 a side
I am not disagreeing with you that there is potential within the team but it will depend on how it is set up. There were those who were saying we had the best squad for decades last season but they appear to have not been managed well overall. (Well, were not!) The team won’t score many if they don’t have shots at goal and the number of attempts per game overall last season was pitiful. Do you think that if or when Micky sets the team up with one up front that the other forwards will regularly chip in with goals? I know the pre-season is about fitness but it is why I asked how many shots the team had against Rangers. I am hopeful that Micky gets the strikers he wants. I just think it will be difficult. I will be pleased if he builds a team that ‘has a go’ so to speak, and doesn’t end up playing nice triangles on the periphery areas of the pitch! Certainly, it is looking good in terms of the defensive side of the team.We already have a number of players in the squad who will chip in with goals, I'm sure the striker who comes in will also score a decent amount.
I don't think the amount oh shots st goal in the Rangers game or any of the pre season games is of any relevance to our league 2 campaign.I am not disagreeing with you that there is potential within the team but it will depend on how it is set up. There were those who were saying we had the best squad for decades last season but they appear to have not been managed well overall. (Well, were not!) The team won’t score many if they don’t have shots at goal and the number of attempts per game overall last season was pitiful. Do you think that if or when Micky sets the team up with one up front that the other forwards will regularly chip in with goals? I know the pre-season is about fitness but it is why I asked how many shots the team had against Rangers. I am hopeful that Micky gets the strikers he wants. I just think it will be difficult. I will be pleased if he builds a team that ‘has a go’ so to speak, and doesn’t end up playing nice triangles on the periphery areas of the pitch! Certainly, it is looking good in terms of the defensive side of the team.
Which one? Or could it be both?We will sign another experienced striker. However, having watched Glatzel and Nevitt last week, I think at least one of those two might surprise people and have a good season.