I thought it was another mixed performance but an improved second half display. We created enough to get the three points in the end, but familiar failings in the eighteen yard box let us down.
I thought the first half display showed the dangers of trying to overplay at this level when you have limited players. We tried to play out from the back on every occasion but could not beat Harrogate's press and kept turning the ball over in midfield. The goal resulted from one such turnover, a brilliant finish by Armstrong who is exactly what we are lacking up front. We had not really created anything from open play, other than a couple of great bursts and crosses by Bristow, but it was a great free kick by Hughes to equalise.
The first twenty minutes of the second half were much better. We played higher up the pitch, with a greater tempo and intensity, and some of the football was very good to watch. The possession stats must have been off the scale in our favour in that period. However, a number of chances were spurned, notably by Turnbull and Mumbongo, and as at Colchester last Saturday we looked quite porous defensively on the counter attack, with Hewelt forced to make a couple of excellent saves.
Individually, I thought Bristow, Hawkes and Saunders had decent games and I actually liked the look of Hemmings playing in the number ten role in the closing stages.
However, the problems up front remain and, as unpopular or popular as it may be, I preferred Mellon's disciplined, pragmatic approach, to the 'you play a bit, we play a bit' style under Dawes. Two games against poor opposition and we have not won either of them.