Boz
Member
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Messages
- 8,938
- Player
- Iain Hume
You won't be surprised to hear that I don't entirely agree with you CK.So far as Vaughan is concerned, I'm pretty much the same as with Stockton...if he wants to stay great, if not so what.
Don't think we should get paranoid about pace, or lack of it, defensively.
As RLC says, attack wise we should be ok and leaking the odd goal at the back through being skinned should be manageable.
For too long we've been virtually static in the opposition half. We now have players who can move (with or without the ball) at pace.
Much prefer pace up front than at the back.
Yes, we can manage without Stockton and Vaughan, though if it is true that we only offered the latter a 3 month deal when Micky was prepared to give the injury-prone Wallace 2 years, then nobody can blame Lee for taking a 2 year deal elsewhere.
I think there is a difference between lack of pace and sloth at the back. If the manager is of the view that McNulty's plusses outweigh the minuses, then we do need either someone of Ihiekwe's pace to cover him or to pack the midfield for extra protection. I don't think that we can be reliant on outscoring what we concede.