- 21 Sep 2005
- Fav Player
Strong rumours now that Norwood is set to sign on Mon, 18-month contract as bigmart alludes to above.
Would that not depend on whether we get promoted or not? Otherwise, he is losing money as the club he signs for will have to pay a transfer fee meaning less wages for the player. You are making it sound a very unselfish act of loyalty.I would guess that even if Norwood signs he will still go in the summer, but at least we will be guaranteed a substantial fee for him.
It is exactly what Koumas did a number of years ago. He signed a new long term deal which inflated his transfer value, but he was gone within a couple of months. I think Norwood does feel some loyalty to the club, or he would simply have refused to sign. It is not as if he will be short of offers in the summer.Would that not depend on whether we get promoted or not? Otherwise, he is losing money as the club he signs for will have to pay a transfer fee meaning less wages for the player. You are making it sound a very unselfish act of loyalty.
My guess is that he would like to stay, particularly on higher wages, but wants to keep his options open. However, he may still go if we get a good offer in the summer, but it's no longer a given.
I hope so. Perhaps MM thinks that CJ and Gilmour will play ahead of him in that number 10 type role so he would be very limited in respect of game time.well im shocked . never given a propper chance . always looked ok or good . thank you for that goal in the playoffs last year . good luck for the future . now you would think mm has some one lined up to come in