aldoes mustache
Member
- Joined
- 24 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 4,185
- Player
- aldo
playing the irish batting first . sunny day and 42-6 what the hell are they doing its crazy . but fair play to the IRISH
That is not really true though is it ? May 2019 proves that is not the case, let alone Barrow in 2016, or Southampton in 2001.Cricket is a game where it genuinely isn't over till its over, unlike football where teams can just wind the clock down.
I take your point, but there is a difference between sports like football and rugby where teams can gain momentum but run out of time. In sports like tennis and Test cricket, time is not of the essence, so you always have hope until the last point is won or the last wicket falls.That is not really true though is it ? May 2019 proves that is not the case, let alone Barrow in 2016, or Southampton in 2001.
Agreed. As an Englishman and a cricket fan, it was dramatic and significant. However, as a Rovers fan who was at Wembley and understood the possible impact of failure, the BW game is probably the most dramatic and significant game I will ever see.It was a great result for England, but the Boreham Wood game would beat it every time for me, for both drama and significance.
I still do not really agree. By all logic England had run out of momentum and wickets at 67 all out and what followed defies reason, the same as the Barrow and Southampton games. I think both sports have the potential for great drama, regardless of the different scoring systems. Although there is the potential for comebacks like England's today, they are no more common in test cricket than teams coming from three down with five minutes to go.I take your point, but there is a difference between sports like football and rugby where teams can gain momentum but run out of time. In sports like tennis and Test cricket, time is not of the essence, so you always have hope until the last point is won or the last wicket falls.