There is nothing wrong with Hibs !Your career is pretty much over when you add this to your profile:
Although a bit underwhelming, that's a fair point. I think in my mind I was expecting a Miller type player, big and strong to play that centre forward role. I think my memory of him wasn't great although I think he spent a lot of time on the bench coming on late in games so difficult to really get any momentum.I think Dagnell has been brought in to bump up the numbers. We have only got two specialist strikers at the moment, which leaves us quite vulnerable.
I would go along with that - Mullin certainly seemed to do well when coming on as the game opened up but has not been anywhere near as successful when starting IMO. Dagnall is to my mind a little underwhelming yes given he wasn't first choice at Bury and is short so we still do not have a target man but not altogether surprising given MM had done the hard part in bringing in Miller and has been scuppered by his injury.Is Mullin more of an impact player as he seems to drift if played from the start but has greater impact coming from the bench?
In fairness to Dagnall, he had a better career than a lot of the strikers we had after his departure. I still think we should have been more patient with him.I agree about Dagnall BBTC. I got to a few more games in his early days when visiting my now deceased father who was a big Rovers fan. I thought he had the potential to have a really top career. He has done well but not as well as he might have done.
I am not sure that is entirely fair. How many games has he actually started ? Not too many. At Morecambe he played the full ninety minutes and was outstanding, and he was good against Exeter and Crawley as well.Is Mullin more of an impact player as he seems to drift if played from the start but has greater impact coming from the bench?